The whole tone of the weird New York Times piece is that it was Hill who was the victim during the 1991 Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, not Thomas. ...
Gee, any concerns here for how the hearings got out of control for Clarence Thomas? Do you think maybe Thomas was made to feel uncomfortable? Do you think maybe Thomas and his wife felt hurt by ineptitude and insensitivity? How awkward was it for Clarence Thomas to be publicly accused of these crude statements? For liberals, fairness is a one-way street, and the conservative is presumed guilty as charged.
Even old Joe seemed puzzled by the thrust of the Times’s guilt-laden “news report.” The day after the Times piece appeared, Biden appeared on ABC’s outlandish The View, where he dared to aver, “I don’t think I treated her badly.”
Biden’s statement must have caused an eruption among the hysterical Left, prompting him to leap on his sword three days later, with the shamed penitent dashing off to Good Morning America to confess: “She did not get treated well. That’s my responsibility. As the committee chairman, I take responsibility that she did not get treated well. I take responsibility for that.”
Good boy, Joe. Good boy.
