Clinton Foundation Internal Audit: Quid Pro Quos Expected

An independent “governance review” conducted by a prominent law firm that specializes in philanthropic issues concluded in December 2010 that the Clinton Foundation had a weak, rubber stamp board of directors and that many of its donors had “an expectation of a quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.” The blistering review — commissioned by Chelsea Clinton and made public Thursday by WikiLeaks — described a tax-exempt public foundation with none of the independent oversight required under federal charity law.